Pelt v. Pelt
This text of 2 Navajo Rptr. 127 (Pelt v. Pelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court having reviewed the Notice of Appeal filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to 7 N.T.C. 801(b) finds:
1. The appeal is not from a final judgment or order of the District Court of the Navajo Nation as required by 7 N.T.C. 801(a) and Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure of the Navajo Courts; and
2. The order of the Shiprock District Court dated August 17, 1979 specifically leaves the issue of the custody of the parties' minor children undecided and, further, orders a Bureau of Indian Affairs Social Services home investigation with recommendations to be submitted to the Court within ninety (90) days; and
3. Interlocutory appeals are not permitted under the Rules of Appellate Procedure of the Navajo Nation. Thompson vs. General Electric Credit Corporation, 1 Nav.R. 234 (1977); Estate of Fulton, 1 Nav.R. 243 (1977); Todachine vs. Navajo Tribe, 1 Nav.R. 241 (1977); Howard Dana vs. Navajo Housing Authority, 1 Nav.R. 255 (1978).
THEREFORE, the appeal in the above-entitled matter filed [128]*128September 17, 1979, is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Navajo Rptr. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelt-v-pelt-navajoctapp-1979.