Pelot v. Loeb

149 So. 336, 111 Fla. 295, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1969
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 336 (Pelot v. Loeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pelot v. Loeb, 149 So. 336, 111 Fla. 295, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1969 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Davis, C. J.

In this case motion is made to dismiss the appeal. An interlocutory order overruling a motion to dismiss a bill of complaint was entered November 10th, 1932. *296 Final decree was entered in the cause on March 28th, 1933j as appears from a certified copy of said final decree attached to the appellee’s motion to dismiss the present appeal, which appeal was taken on April 29th, 1933, solely from the interlocutory order of November 10th, 1932. No entry of appeal brings up for review the final decree of March 28th, 1933, the rendition of which antedated the entry of the present appeal from the antecedent interlocutory order.

An appeal in an equity cause, taken subsequently to the rendition of a final decree therein, solely and expressly from an interlocutory order therein, that does not bring up such final decree for review, cannot be considered by this Court and will be dismissed. Banks v. Guinyard, 63 Fla. 334, 58 Sou. Rep. 229; Oneida Land Co. v. Richards, 72 Fla. 116, 72 Sou. Rep. 646; Stanley v. Standard Cypress Co., 54 Fla. 583, 45 Sou. Rep. 478. See also cases referred to in 1 Encyclopaedic Digest of Florida Reports, page 196, et seq.

On the authority of the cases just cited, and the showing made that this appeal is from an interlocutory order, and was not entered until after the final decree, which is not brought up by it, the present appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stanley v. Standard Cypress Co.
54 Fla. 583 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Banks v. Guinyard
63 Fla. 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1912)
Oneida Land Co. v. Richards
72 So. 646 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 336, 111 Fla. 295, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelot-v-loeb-fla-1933.