Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance
This text of 253 A.2d 183 (Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment dismissing their suit to recover against the defendant for a fire loss.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Mehler reported at 102 N. J. Super. 357 (Law Div. 1968). See also Staehle v. American Employers Ins. Co., 103 N. J. Super. 152 (App. Div. 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.2d 183, 105 N.J. Super. 474, 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peloso-v-hartford-fire-insurance-njsuperctappdiv-1969.