Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance

253 A.2d 183, 105 N.J. Super. 474, 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 543
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 14, 1969·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment dismissing their suit to recover against the defendant for a fire loss.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Mehler reported at 102 N. J. Super. 357 (Law Div. 1968). See also Staehle v. American Employers Ins. Co., 103 N. J. Super. 152 (App. Div. 1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 253 A.2d 183, 105 N.J. Super. 474, 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 543 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).

253 A.2d 183 (Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gremillion v. Travelers Indemnity Company
240 So. 2d 727 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1970)
Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
267 A.2d 498 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)