Pelonsky v. C. L. Pierson Manufacturing Co.

32 Misc. 778, 66 N.Y.S. 485
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 778 (Pelonsky v. C. L. Pierson Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pelonsky v. C. L. Pierson Manufacturing Co., 32 Misc. 778, 66 N.Y.S. 485 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The answer of the defendant clearly shows that it had knowledge of all facts necessary to enable it to proceed with the trial herein. It appears to us that the demand for a bill of particulars was made probably to delay the speedy trial of this action as before stated. No bill of particulars was needed to enable it to try the issues formed by the pleadings.

The order appealed from is reversed. Defendant’s motion for bill of particulars denied, with ten dollars costs, and disbursements of this appeal.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Order reversed, motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 778, 66 N.Y.S. 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelonsky-v-c-l-pierson-manufacturing-co-nynyccityct-1900.