Pelly v. The Samuel Morris

E.D. New York

Pelly v. The Samuel Morris

63 F. 736, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 63 F. 736 (Pelly v. The Samuel Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pelly v. The Samuel Morris, 63 F. 736, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151 (E.D.N.Y. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

These cases come before the court on the question of apportionment of the proceeds of the sale of the vessel. The amount in court is $848.26. The claims amount to $1,848. The first libel was filed on July 2, 1894. Of the claims, the claim of Greason, for $125.80, and that of Palmer, $54.40, accrued' within 40 days from the time of the filing of the libel. All the other claims arose between July, 1893, and May 1, 1894. The question is whether the rule applied by Judge Brown in the case of The Proceeds of The Gratitude, 42 Fed. 299, shall be applied in a case like this, according to which rule claims having accrued within 40 days take priority in payment over older claims. The rule laid down in the case of the Gratitude seems to be a very proper rule, and I see no reason why it should not be applied in a case like this. Accordingly the order will be that Greason and Palmer be paid first in the distribution of the proceeds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BENEDICT, District Judge.

These cases come before the court on the question of apportionment of the proceeds of the sale of the vessel. The amount in court is $848.26. The claims amount to $1,848. The first libel was filed on July 2, 1894. Of the claims, the claim of Greason, for $125.80, and that of Palmer, $54.40, accrued' within 40 days from the time of the filing of the libel. All the other claims arose between July, 1893, and May 1, 1894. The question is whether the rule applied by Judge Brown in the case of The Proceeds of The Gratitude, 42 Fed. 299, shall be applied in a case like this, according to which rule claims having accrued within 40 days take priority in payment over older claims. The rule laid down in the case of the Gratitude seems to be a very proper rule, and I see no reason why it should not be applied in a case like this. Accordingly the order will be that Greason and Palmer be paid first in the distribution of the proceeds.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 F. 736, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelly-v-the-samuel-morris-nyed-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack