Pelly v. The Samuel Morris

63 F. 736, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided September 11, 1894·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

These cases come before the court on the question of apportionment of the proceeds of the sale of the vessel. The amount in court is $848.26. The claims amount to $1,848. The first libel was filed on July 2, 1894. Of the claims, the claim of Greason, for $125.80, and that of Palmer, $54.40, accrued' within 40 days from the time of the filing of the libel. All the other claims arose between July, 1893, and May 1, 1894. The question is whether the rule applied by Judge Brown in the case of The Proceeds of The Gratitude, 42 Fed. 299, shall be applied in a case like this, according to which rule claims having accrued within 40 days take priority in payment over older claims. The rule laid down in the case of the Gratitude seems to be a very proper rule, and I see no reason why it should not be applied in a case like this. Accordingly the order will be that Greason and Palmer be paid first in the distribution of the proceeds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pelly v. The Samuel Morris, 63 F. 736, 1894 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151 (E.D.N.Y. 1894).

63 F. 736 (Pelly v. The Samuel Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Interstate No. 1
290 F. 926 (Second Circuit, 1923)
The Samuel Little
221 F. 308 (Second Circuit, 1915)
The Edith
217 F. 300 (W.D. Washington, 1914)
Appeal of Milwaukee Dry Dock Co.
69 F. 1009 (Seventh Circuit, 1895)