Pellock v. Schenectady Railway Co.
161 A.D. 907, 145 N.Y.S. 1137
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 161 A.D. 907 (Pellock v. Schenectady Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pellock v. Schenectady Railway Co., 161 A.D. 907, 145 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, the court holding that there is a question of fact for the jury. All concurred, except Woodward, J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 A.D. 907, 145 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellock-v-schenectady-railway-co-nyappdiv-1914.