Pellito v. Home Depot, Inc.
600 So. 2d 43, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6872, 1992 WL 131825
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Although the rulings of the trial court at trial and on the motion for new trial were not necessarily those which this panel may have made, we cannot conclude that the rulings constituted an abuse of judicial discretion or reversible error. Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pellito v. Home Depot, Inc., 600 So. 2d 43, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6872, 1992 WL 131825 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
600 So. 2d 43 (Pellito v. Home Depot, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis
401 So. 2d 1341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)