Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.
This text of 237 A.D. 759 (Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No triable issue is presented by the answering affidavit. The mortgage is eoncededly past due and no consideration has been shown for the alleged extension agreement. The exact amount due may be determined before a referee appointed to compute.
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion- granted, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 759, 264 N.Y.S. 214, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellino-v-3232-hull-avenue-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1933.