Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.

237 A.D. 759, 264 N.Y.S. 214, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10718

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 17, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No triable issue is presented by the answering affidavit. The mortgage is eoncededly past due and no consideration has been shown for the alleged extension agreement. The exact amount due may be determined before a referee appointed to compute.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion- granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

No triable issue is presented by the answering affidavit. The mortgage is eoncededly past due and no consideration has been shown for the alleged extension agreement. The exact amount due may be determined before a referee appointed to compute.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion- granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.

Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp., 237 A.D. 759, 264 N.Y.S. 214, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

237 A.D. 759 (Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related