Pellicane v. Nardy
This text of 83 A.D.2d 842 (Pellicane v. Nardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southampton which denied petitioner’s application for area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), dated November 3, 1980, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Special Term properly determined that the Zoning Board of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to grant the 10 requested area variances (see Van Deusen v Jackson, 35 AD2d 58, affd 28 NY2d 608; cf. Matter of Cohalan v Schermerhorn, 77 Misc 2d 23). Gulotta, J.P., Cohalan, O’Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.D.2d 842, 441 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellicane-v-nardy-nyappdiv-1981.