Pelletier v. Coleman
This text of 119 F. App'x 545 (Pelletier v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Russell Adam Pelletier appeals the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action pursuant to a jury verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pelletier v. Coleman, No. CA-02-828-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 F. App'x 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelletier-v-coleman-ca4-2005.