Peller v. Central Trust Co.
This text of 216 F. 889 (Peller v. Central Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peller in one case and Ida Moseson in the other were in possession of property which they respectively had obtained from Goldstein and Moseson before the involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed. Each objected to a summary disposition of his rights, denied that he obtained or held possession as agent or bailee of Goldstein and Moseson, and filed answers and gave testimony of facts which, if true, showed title and possession in himself prior to the institution of the bankruptcy proceeding.
[890]*890For the reasons given iii cause No. 2016, 216 Fed. 887, 133 C. C. A. 91, herewith decided, the order in each of these cases is reversed, with the direction to dismiss the summary proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 F. 889, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peller-v-central-trust-co-ca7-1914.