Peller v. Central Trust Co.

Seventh Circuit

Peller v. Central Trust Co.

216 F. 889, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1394

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided August 12, 1914·No. Nos. 2018 and 2019·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BAKER, Circuit Judge.

Peller in one case and Ida Moseson in the other were in possession of property which they respectively had obtained from Goldstein and Moseson before the involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed. Each objected to a summary disposition of his rights, denied that he obtained or held possession as agent or bailee of Goldstein and Moseson, and filed answers and gave testimony of facts which, if true, showed title and possession in himself prior to the institution of the bankruptcy proceeding.

[890]*890For the reasons given iii cause No. 2016, 216 Fed. 887, 133 C. C. A. 91, herewith decided, the order in each of these cases is reversed, with the direction to dismiss the summary proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAKER, Circuit Judge.

Peller in one case and Ida Moseson in the other were in possession of property which they respectively had obtained from Goldstein and Moseson before the involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed. Each objected to a summary disposition of his rights, denied that he obtained or held possession as agent or bailee of Goldstein and Moseson, and filed answers and gave testimony of facts which, if true, showed title and possession in himself prior to the institution of the bankruptcy proceeding.

[890]*890For the reasons given iii cause No. 2016, 216 Fed. 887, 133 C. C. A. 91, herewith decided, the order in each of these cases is reversed, with the direction to dismiss the summary proceeding.

Peller v. Central Trust Co., 216 F. 889, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1394 (7th Cir. 1914).

Pincite

216 F. 889 (Peller v. Central Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related