Pellegrino v. AMPCO SYSTEMS PARKING
This text of 764 N.W.2d 569 (Pellegrino v. AMPCO SYSTEMS PARKING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for immediate consideration of the motion to strike is granted. The motion to strike is granted in part. The paragraph spanning pages 1 and 2 of the plaintiffs’ response to the defendant’s application for leave to appeal is stricken because it contains information that is not part of the record on appeal. MCR 7.210(A)(1). The motion for extension of time to file a reply and the motion to note recent Supreme Court decision are granted. The application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008, judgment of the Court of Appeals is granted, limited to the issue whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial based on a violation of MCR 2.511(F)(2). Court of Appeals No. 274743.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
764 N.W.2d 569, 483 Mich. 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellegrino-v-ampco-systems-parking-mich-2009.