Pellegrino Di Leo v. Filippo Catanzaro

115 A. 925, 96 Conn. 725, 1921 Conn. LEXIS 141

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Examination of the evidence shows that the motion to correct the finding is almost in its entirety wholly without merit; the rest of the motion is without significance and, if granted, could not affect the questions of law involved in the appeal. Unless the finding be corrected the claimed errors of law, as the appellant concedes, cannot be successfully pursued.

There is no error.