Pellegrin v. City of Gretna

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Pellegrin v. City of Gretna

62 So. 2d 824, 222 La. 527, 1953 La. LEXIS 1184

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 12, 1953

Docket41044

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 62 So. 2d 824 (Pellegrin v. City of Gretna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pellegrin v. City of Gretna, 62 So. 2d 824, 222 La. 527, 1953 La. LEXIS 1184 (La. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PONDER, Justice.

We granted writs in this case and issued a stay order, on application of the relator, in order to review the ruling of the trial judge, wherein he refused to issue a preliminary injunction prohibiting the City of Gretna from enforcing a resolution of the Board of Aldermen revoking a liquor permit issued to relator. The attorney for the relator calls our attention to the fact that the license issued, upon which this suit is based, expired on December 31, 1952.

Under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 26 :71 the license has expired and the *529 issues presented in this suit have become moot. We take judicial notice of the statutes of this state. Miller v. Molony, 157 La. 811, 103 So. 162. The record and the statute show that the question has now become moot and there is no longer any issue to be decided between the litigants. Therefore, this Court, on its own motion, will dismiss the proceedings. Doss v. Board of Commissioners, 117 La. 450, 41 So. 720; State ex rel. Le Blanc v. Twenty-First Judicial Dist. Democratic Committee, 123 La. 384, 48 So. 1005.

For the reasons assigned, the writs are recalled, the stay order set aside, and the suit is dismissed at relator’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PONDER, Justice.

We granted writs in this case and issued a stay order, on application of the relator, in order to review the ruling of the trial judge, wherein he refused to issue a preliminary injunction prohibiting the City of Gretna from enforcing a resolution of the Board of Aldermen revoking a liquor permit issued to relator. The attorney for the relator calls our attention to the fact that the license issued, upon which this suit is based, expired on December 31, 1952.

Under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 26 :71 the license has expired and the *529 issues presented in this suit have become moot. We take judicial notice of the statutes of this state. Miller v. Molony, 157 La. 811, 103 So. 162. The record and the statute show that the question has now become moot and there is no longer any issue to be decided between the litigants. Therefore, this Court, on its own motion, will dismiss the proceedings. Doss v. Board of Commissioners, 117 La. 450, 41 So. 720; State ex rel. Le Blanc v. Twenty-First Judicial Dist. Democratic Committee, 123 La. 384, 48 So. 1005.

For the reasons assigned, the writs are recalled, the stay order set aside, and the suit is dismissed at relator’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 So. 2d 824, 222 La. 527, 1953 La. LEXIS 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellegrin-v-city-of-gretna-la-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack