Pellegal v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc.
This text of 994 So. 2d 1289 (Pellegal v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arleen PELLEGAL, et al.
v.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC. f/k/a Avondale Industries, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ denied.
CALOGERO, C.J., concurs and assigns reasons.
CALOGERO, Chief Justice, concurring in the denial of the writ and assigning reasons.
While I join the majority in denying this writ application, I write separately to express the view that Plaintiffs/Relators are free to reurge their motion during the course of the proceeding if it becomes apparent that Mr. Gravelles' testimony is critical to the case. Additionally, Plaintiffs/Relators may seek a remedy on appeal, at which time the court of appeal will have the benefit of a fully-developed record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
994 So. 2d 1289, 2008 WL 5000168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellegal-v-northrop-grumman-ship-systems-inc-la-2008.