Pellas v. . Motley
38 N.E. 100, 143 N.Y. 657, 98 Sickels 657, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1047
Opinion
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 659 Per Curiam opinion for modification of judgment and affirmance as modified.
All concur, except ANDREWS, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pellas v. . Motley, 38 N.E. 100, 143 N.Y. 657, 98 Sickels 657, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1047 (N.Y. 1894).
38 N.E. 100 (Pellas v. . Motley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hatfield, Trustee v. Ralston
155 N.E. 221 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1927)