Pellas v. . Motley
38 N.E. 100, 143 N.Y. 657, 98 Sickels 657, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1047
This text of 38 N.E. 100 (Pellas v. . Motley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pellas v. . Motley, 38 N.E. 100, 143 N.Y. 657, 98 Sickels 657, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1047 (N.Y. 1894).
Opinion
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 659 Per Curiam opinion for modification of judgment and affirmance as modified.
All concur, except ANDREWS, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hatfield, Trustee v. Ralston
155 N.E. 221 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 N.E. 100, 143 N.Y. 657, 98 Sickels 657, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pellas-v-motley-ny-1894.