Pell v. Manhattan Railway Co.
34 N.Y.S. 1145, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 878
This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1145 (Pell v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pell v. Manhattan Railway Co., 34 N.Y.S. 1145, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 878 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be affirmed. One difficulty with the appellants’ argument as to the credibility of some of the witnesses is that it depends upon evidence given by them in other cases, which is not contained in this record, and which does not seem ever to have been offered in evidence. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 N.Y.S. 1145, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pell-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysupct-1895.