Pell v. Lovett

19 Wend. 546
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 19 Wend. 546 (Pell v. Lovett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pell v. Lovett, 19 Wend. 546 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

Opinion

[547]*547 By the Court,

Bronson, J.

It has been often said that . . .. counts in covenant cannot be joined with counts in assumpsit; 1 Chit. Pl. 199; Tidd Pr. 10, 11; and if there be no adjudged case upon the precise point, it is because no one has ever before ventured on the experiment of declaring in this manner. That a misjoinder of counts is fatal on a writ of error as well as on demurrer, has often been decided in England, and was adjudged by this court in Cooper v. Bissell, 16 Johns. R. 146. Although the present statute of amendments, 2 R. S. 424, is in some respects broader than the former one, it has not cured this objection,

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kerr v. Martin
7 Haw. 645 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1889)
Wilkinson v. Moseley
30 Ala. 562 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)
Fulton v. Heaton
1 Barb. 552 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pell-v-lovett-nysupct-1838.