Pell v. Executors of Ball

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Pell v. Executors of Ball

17 S.C. Eq. 518

DecidedJanuary 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 17 S.C. Eq. 518 (Pell v. Executors of Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pell v. Executors of Ball, 17 S.C. Eq. 518 (S.C. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Cana, per Johnson, Ch.

The court, after a careful examination of the grounds of this appeal, are of opinion that they cannot prevail, and concur in the decree of the Circuit Court. It is necessary, however, that the cause should go back to the Circuit Court, for the purpose of obtaining the orders necessary to carry into effect the decrees heretofore made ; and it is ordered and decreed, that this appeal be dismissed, and that the cause be referred back to the Circuit Court, to make such order as may be necessary and proper for effecting partition of the real estates, con-formably to the decrees of the court heretofore made, by sale or otherwise, as may be found necessary ; and also, to make such further order as may be necessary for the final settlement of the estate.

Dunkin and Harper, Chancellors, concurred. Johnston, Ch., absent, at the hearing, from indisposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cana, per Johnson, Ch.

The court, after a careful examination of the grounds of this appeal, are of opinion that they cannot prevail, and concur in the decree of the Circuit Court. It is necessary, however, that the cause should go back to the Circuit Court, for the purpose of obtaining the orders necessary to carry into effect the decrees heretofore made ; and it is ordered and decreed, that this appeal be dismissed, and that the cause be referred back to the Circuit Court, to make such order as may be necessary and proper for effecting partition of the real estates, con-formably to the decrees of the court heretofore made, by sale or otherwise, as may be found necessary ; and also, to make such further order as may be necessary for the final settlement of the estate.

Dunkin and Harper, Chancellors, concurred. Johnston, Ch., absent, at the hearing, from indisposition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.C. Eq. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pell-v-executors-of-ball-sc-1844.