Pell (Richard M.), Miller (James R.), O'Brien (James J.) v. Weinstein (Michael), Glantz (Ernest), Bober (Richard), Bloom (Brude M.), Kagan (Philip), Erard (Philip), Finkle & Ross, Lustig (Dennis)

961 F.2d 1568
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 7, 1992·No. 91-5705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

961 F.2d 1568

Pell (Richard M.), Miller (James R.), O'Brien (James J.)
v.
Weinstein (Michael), Glantz (Ernest), Bober (Richard), Bloom
(Brude M.), Kagan (Philip), Erard (Philip), Finkle
& Ross, Lustig (Dennis)

NOS. 91-5705, 91-5833

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Apr 07, 1992

Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,

McClure, J.,

759 F.Supp. 1107

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pell (Richard M.), Miller (James R.), O'Brien (James J.) v. Weinstein (Michael), Glantz (Ernest), Bober (Richard), Bloom (Brude M.), Kagan (Philip), Erard (Philip), Finkle & Ross, Lustig (Dennis), 961 F.2d 1568 (3d Cir. 1992).

961 F.2d 1568 (Pell (Richard M.), Miller (James R.), O'Brien (James J.) v. Weinstein (Michael), Glantz (Ernest), Bober (Richard), Bloom (Brude M.), Kagan (Philip), Erard (Philip), Finkle & Ross, Lustig (Dennis)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re WorldCom, Inc.
377 B.R. 77 (S.D. New York, 2007)