Pelini v. Big Ten Yellow Cab Co.

191 So. 2d 425
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 1966
DocketNo. 35608
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 2d 425 (Pelini v. Big Ten Yellow Cab Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pelini v. Big Ten Yellow Cab Co., 191 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fee in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’-CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 2d 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelini-v-big-ten-yellow-cab-co-fla-1966.