Pelin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

115 A.D. 883

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on authority of decision in same case on former appeal (102 App. Div. 71). All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented for reasons stated in dissenting opinion on former appeal (102 App. Div. 75).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pelin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 115 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

115 A.D. 883 (Pelin v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.