Pelham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pelham v. State

696 So. 2d 822, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2405, 1997 WL 118237

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 1997

DocketNo. 96-00883

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 822 (Pelham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pelham v. State, 696 So. 2d 822, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2405, 1997 WL 118237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Calvin Wayne Pelham filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there is no meritorious argument to support the contention that the trial court committed reversible error. However, counsel argues the trial court imposed certain costs without notice to the defendant. We agree and strike the $3.00 discretionary cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(3), Florida Statutes (1995), the public defender lien in the amount of $150.00, and the $100.00 lab fee. On remand the trial court may reimpose these costs after notice to the defendant and an opportunity to be heard.

THREADGILL, C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Calvin Wayne Pelham filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there is no meritorious argument to support the contention that the trial court committed reversible error. However, counsel argues the trial court imposed certain costs without notice to the defendant. We agree and strike the $3.00 discretionary cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(3), Florida Statutes (1995), the public defender lien in the amount of $150.00, and the $100.00 lab fee. On remand the trial court may reimpose these costs after notice to the defendant and an opportunity to be heard.

THREADGILL, C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 822, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2405, 1997 WL 118237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelham-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack