Pelham v. State

696 So. 2d 822, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2405, 1997 WL 118237
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pelham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 737 So. 2d 572
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 1997·No. No. 96-00883·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Calvin Wayne Pelham filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there is no meritorious argument to support the contention that the trial court committed reversible error. However, counsel argues the trial court imposed certain costs without notice to the defendant. We agree and strike the $3.00 discretionary cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(3), Florida Statutes (1995), the public defender lien in the amount of $150.00, and the $100.00 lab fee. On remand the trial court may reimpose these costs after notice to the defendant and an opportunity to be heard.

THREADGILL, C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pelham v. State, 696 So. 2d 822, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2405, 1997 WL 118237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

696 So. 2d 822 (Pelham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)