Pelham v. Big Creek Mining Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Pelham v. Big Creek Mining Co.

173 P. 376, 31 Idaho 464, 1918 Ida. LEXIS 46

DecidedJune 25, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 173 P. 376 (Pelham v. Big Creek Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pelham v. Big Creek Mining Co., 173 P. 376, 31 Idaho 464, 1918 Ida. LEXIS 46 (Idaho 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

BUDGE, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandate compelling appellants to permit re[466]*466spondent and his authorized agent to examine the books and records of the appellant company and take copies thereof.

The questions raised by this appeal are identical in every respect with the questions before the court and disposed of in the case of Pfirman v. Success Mining Co., 30 Ida. 468, 166 Pac. 216. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Morgan and Rice, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUDGE, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandate compelling appellants to permit re[466]*466spondent and his authorized agent to examine the books and records of the appellant company and take copies thereof.

The questions raised by this appeal are identical in every respect with the questions before the court and disposed of in the case of Pfirman v. Success Mining Co., 30 Ida. 468, 166 Pac. 216. Upon the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Morgan and Rice, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 P. 376, 31 Idaho 464, 1918 Ida. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelham-v-big-creek-mining-co-idaho-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack