Peleps v. Oliver

Ohio Supreme Court

Peleps v. Oliver

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 17, 1956

DocketNo. 34645

StatusPublished

This text of 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493 (Peleps v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peleps v. Oliver, 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493 (Ohio 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Whether plaintiff was a “guest” while riding in the automobile operated by Oliver’s agent was an important issue in the case, and, the issue having been raised both by the pleadings and the evidence, the court’s denial of counsel’s request to charge thereon was error prejudicial to Oliver. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Common Pleas Court for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Whether plaintiff was a “guest” while riding in the automobile operated by Oliver’s agent was an important issue in the case, and, the issue having been raised both by the pleadings and the evidence, the court’s denial of counsel’s request to charge thereon was error prejudicial to Oliver. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Common Pleas Court for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peleps-v-oliver-ohio-1956.