Pelella v. Pelella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pelella v. Pelella

9 A.D.2d 897, 195 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5718

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 897 (Pelella v. Pelella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pelella v. Pelella, 9 A.D.2d 897, 195 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4), with leave to plead over. The complaint alleged that respondent procured an ex parte divorce in a foreign jurisdiction, based upon an instrument of waiver and consent on which appellant’s signature was surreptitiously forged. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [13 Mise 2d 260.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the appeal is from an order which granted a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4), with leave to plead over. The complaint alleged that respondent procured an ex parte divorce in a foreign jurisdiction, based upon an instrument of waiver and consent on which appellant’s signature was surreptitiously forged. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [13 Mise 2d 260.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 897, 195 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelella-v-pelella-nyappdiv-1959.