Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Peleg v. Spitz

Peleg v. Spitz

889 N.E.2d 1019, 118 Ohio St. 3d 446
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 2008·No. No. 2008-0182·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Shoemaker v. Gindlesberger, 118 Ohio St.3d 226, 2008-Ohio-2012, 887 N.E.2d 1167.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peleg v. Spitz, 889 N.E.2d 1019, 118 Ohio St. 3d 446 (Ohio 2008).

889 N.E.2d 1019 (Peleg v. Spitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cartwright v. Batner
2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)