Peleg v. Spitz
889 N.E.2d 1019, 118 Ohio St. 3d 446
This text of 889 N.E.2d 1019 (Peleg v. Spitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peleg v. Spitz, 889 N.E.2d 1019, 118 Ohio St. 3d 446 (Ohio 2008).
Opinion
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Shoemaker v. Gindlesberger, 118 Ohio St.3d 226, 2008-Ohio-2012, 887 N.E.2d 1167.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cartwright v. Batner
2014 Ohio 2995 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
889 N.E.2d 1019, 118 Ohio St. 3d 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peleg-v-spitz-ohio-2008.