Pelchat v. State

526 So. 2d 1071, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1465, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2601, 1988 WL 62675
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 1988
DocketNo. 87-990
StatusPublished

This text of 526 So. 2d 1071 (Pelchat v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pelchat v. State, 526 So. 2d 1071, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1465, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2601, 1988 WL 62675 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As in James v. State, 499 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), this appeal could have easily been avoided. This cause is remanded for the determination of the amount of restitution and appropriate amendment of [1072]*1072the four subject probation orders reflecting such determination.

THOMPSON, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. State
499 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 So. 2d 1071, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1465, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2601, 1988 WL 62675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelchat-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.