Pelc v. Estate of Wohlert

277 A.D.2d 963, 716 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11644

This text of 277 A.D.2d 963 (Pelc v. Estate of Wohlert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pelc v. Estate of Wohlert, 277 A.D.2d 963, 716 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There is an issue of fact whether the injuries of plaintiff Robert Pele prevented him from performing substantially all of the material acts that constitute his usual and customary daily activities for at least 90 of the 180 days immediately following the accident (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present— Hayes, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5102
New York ISC § 5102

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 963, 716 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelc-v-estate-of-wohlert-nyappdiv-2000.