Pekera v. Purpora

841 A.2d 1191, 267 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 63
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 11, 2004·No. SC 17133·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 685 (AC 23546), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pekera v. Purpora, 841 A.2d 1191, 267 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 63 (Colo. 2004).

841 A.2d 1191 (Pekera v. Purpora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pekera v. Purpora
869 A.2d 1210 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)