Pekera v. Purpora
841 A.2d 1191, 267 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 63
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
DocketSC 17133
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 841 A.2d 1191 (Pekera v. Purpora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pekera v. Purpora, 841 A.2d 1191, 267 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 63 (Colo. 2004).
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 685 (AC 23546), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pekera v. Purpora
869 A.2d 1210 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
841 A.2d 1191, 267 Conn. 919, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pekera-v-purpora-conn-2004.