Peker v. Kaplan
This text of 667 N.E.2d 337 (Peker v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed appellant’s appeal to that Court from an order of Supreme Court denying plaintiff’s discovery requests, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 N.E.2d 337, 88 N.Y.2d 868, 644 N.Y.S.2d 686, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peker-v-kaplan-ny-1996.