Peker v. Fader
164 F. App'x 49
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2006
DocketNo. 05-4546-CV
StatusPublished
This text of 164 F. App'x 49 (Peker v. Fader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peker v. Fader, 164 F. App'x 49 (2d Cir. 2006).
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff appellant H.E. Elya Peker, pro se, appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John G. Koeltl, Judge) dated May 9, 2005, denying Peker’s motion to correct Form AO 121. We have considered the appellant’s contentions and find them without merit.
The district court’s order is therefore AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 F. App'x 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peker-v-fader-ca2-2006.