Peker v. Fader
164 F. App'x 49
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff appellant H.E. Elya Peker, pro se, appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John G. Koeltl, Judge) dated May 9, 2005, denying Peker’s motion to correct Form AO 121. We have considered the appellant’s contentions and find them without merit.
The district court’s order is therefore AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peker v. Fader, 164 F. App'x 49 (2d Cir. 2006).
164 F. App'x 49 (Peker v. Fader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.