Pekarsky v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pekarsky v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

238 A.D. 824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 824 (Pekarsky v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pekarsky v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 238 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered January 10,1933, modified by striking out the last two paragraphs thereof, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the matter 'remitted to Hon. John M. Tierney, official referee, to take proof of the" value of the services of plaintiff's original attorney. Appeal from-order denying motion for reargument dismissed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered January 10,1933, modified by striking out the last two paragraphs thereof, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the matter 'remitted to Hon. John M. Tierney, official referee, to take proof of the" value of the services of plaintiff's original attorney. Appeal from-order denying motion for reargument dismissed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pekarsky-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1933.