PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI Et Al.

Supreme Court

PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI Et Al.

364 U.S. 478, 81 S. Ct. 243, 5 L. Ed. 2d 222, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 85

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 5, 1960

Docket483

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 364 U.S. 478 (PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI Et Al., 364 U.S. 478, 81 S. Ct. 243, 5 L. Ed. 2d 222, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 85 (1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U. S. 450.

Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U. S. 450.

Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

364 U.S. 478, 81 S. Ct. 243, 5 L. Ed. 2d 222, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pekao-trading-corp-v-bragalini-et-al-scotus-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack