Peizer v. Peizer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peizer v. Peizer

60 A.D.2d 598, 400 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 598 (Peizer v. Peizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peizer v. Peizer, 60 A.D.2d 598, 400 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which a judgment of divorce, as amended, required defendant to make alimony and child support payments, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 4, 1976, which, inter alia, adjudged him to be in contempt of court for failing to comply with the alimony and child support provisions of the amended judgment, fined him $1,320 and awarded plaintiff a counsel fee. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. (See Shanley v Shanley, 275 [599]*599App Div 775; Gargiulo v Gargiulo, 18 AD2d 1013.) Defendant’s time to purge himself of the contempt is extended until 15 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which a judgment of divorce, as amended, required defendant to make alimony and child support payments, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 4, 1976, which, inter alia, adjudged him to be in contempt of court for failing to comply with the alimony and child support provisions of the amended judgment, fined him $1,320 and awarded plaintiff a counsel fee. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. (See Shanley v Shanley, 275 [599]*599App Div 775; Gargiulo v Gargiulo, 18 AD2d 1013.) Defendant’s time to purge himself of the contempt is extended until 15 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 598, 400 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peizer-v-peizer-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack