Peirez v. Dodd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peirez v. Dodd

61 A.D.2d 895, 404 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 7, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 895 (Peirez v. Dodd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peirez v. Dodd, 61 A.D.2d 895, 404 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to enjoin the Board of Elections and the "Inspectors of Election and Clerks * * * from preparing and distributing polling lists of those individuals who have voted at the forthcoming Democratic primary to be held on September 8, 1977 for the benefit of any candidate for the office of County Executive”, the appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 6, 1977, as dismissed the petition. Order and judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. We note that the Board of Elections, in its letter to the election inspectors, has specifically directed that the lists be made equally available to all candidates. Latham, J. P., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to enjoin the Board of Elections and the "Inspectors of Election and Clerks * * * from preparing and distributing polling lists of those individuals who have voted at the forthcoming Democratic primary to be held on September 8, 1977 for the benefit of any candidate for the office of County Executive”, the appeal, as limited by appellants’ brief, is from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 6, 1977, as dismissed the petition. Order and judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. We note that the Board of Elections, in its letter to the election inspectors, has specifically directed that the lists be made equally available to all candidates. Latham, J. P., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 895, 404 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peirez-v-dodd-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack