Peirce v. Chase

8 Mass. 487
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Proof that a witness has confessed himself interested in the event of a cause is not sufficient to disqualify him. But where it is proved that the party, by whom the witness is introduced, has acknowledged him so interested, the witness ought not to be sworn. As the deposition of Legate was therefore im properly admitted at the trial, the verdict in this case must be se aside, and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peirce v. Chase, 8 Mass. 487 (Mass. 1812).

8 Mass. 487 (Peirce v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erickson v. Bell
6 N.W. 19 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)
Waughop v. Weeks
22 Ill. 350 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1859)
Erisman v. Walters
26 Pa. 467 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1856)
Martin v. Farnum
24 N.H. 191 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1851)
Carmalt v. Platt
7 Watts 318 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)
Cook v. Mix
11 Conn. 432 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1836)
Cotchet v. Dixon
15 S.C.L. 311 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1827)