Peiffer v. Pro-Cut Concrete Cutting And Breaking, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Peiffer v. Pro-Cut Concrete Cutting And Breaking, Inc.

438 P.3d 115, 193 Wash. 2d 1006

Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2019·No. No. 96762-8·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review and the cross-petition for review are both denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review and the cross-petition for review are both denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Peiffer v. Pro-Cut Concrete Cutting And Breaking, Inc., 438 P.3d 115, 193 Wash. 2d 1006 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

438 P.3d 115 (Peiffer v. Pro-Cut Concrete Cutting And Breaking, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.