Peifer v. Landis
1 Watts 392
This text of 1 Watts 392 (Peifer v. Landis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peifer v. Landis, 1 Watts 392 (Pa. 1833).
Opinion
There is no pretence of parol performance here, because there is no pretence of delivery of possession in pursuance of the contract; which is essential. The evidence, therefore, was properly rejected.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hertzog v. Hertzog's Administrator
34 Pa. 418 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1859)
Allen's Estate
1 Watts & Serg. 383 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1841)
M'Kee v. Phillips
9 Watts 85 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1839)
Ensign v. Kellogg
21 Mass. 1 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1826)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Watts 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peifer-v-landis-pa-1833.