Pegram v. Town of Canton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Pegram v. Town of Canton

103 S.E. 371, 179 N.C. 700, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 331

DecidedJune 2, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 371 (Pegram v. Town of Canton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pegram v. Town of Canton, 103 S.E. 371, 179 N.C. 700, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 331 (N.C. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is unnecessary to discuss or decide the question as to whether or not the defendant would be liable to the plaintiff if the allegations of the complaint bad been established. The Court is unanimously of the opinion that there is not sufficient evidence to be- submitted to the jury to establish the allegations of fact set out in the complaint, and that the motion to nonsuit was properly allowed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is unnecessary to discuss or decide the question as to whether or not the defendant would be liable to the plaintiff if the allegations of the complaint bad been established. The Court is unanimously of the opinion that there is not sufficient evidence to be- submitted to the jury to establish the allegations of fact set out in the complaint, and that the motion to nonsuit was properly allowed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 371, 179 N.C. 700, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pegram-v-town-of-canton-nc-1920.