Pegram v. State

161 S.W. 458, 72 Tex. Crim. 176, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 1913·No. No. 2825.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was fined by the lower court for contempt of court in refusing to obey a subpoena. The record shows that the proceedings were strictly in accordance with articles 528 et seq., Code of Criminal Procedure, and that on the proper final hearing the judgment nisi was made final.

It has been the uniform holding of this court and our Supreme Court, when it had criminal jurisdiction, that appeals did not lie in such proceedings. It is unnecessary to cite all the cases, but see State v. Thurmond, 37 Texas, 340; Carter v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 165; Crow v. State, 24 Texas, 12; Borer v. State, 63 S. W. Rep., 1133.

As this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal the case is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pegram v. State, 161 S.W. 458, 72 Tex. Crim. 176, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606 (Tex. 1913).

161 S.W. 458 (Pegram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. State
352 S.W.2d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Lawley v. State
36 S.W.2d 1035 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Hudgens v. Yancey
284 S.W. 347 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Long v. State
199 S.W. 619 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)