Pegram v. State

161 S.W. 458, 72 Tex. Crim. 176, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 3, 1913
DocketNo. 2825.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 161 S.W. 458 (Pegram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pegram v. State, 161 S.W. 458, 72 Tex. Crim. 176, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606 (Tex. 1913).

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was fined by the lower court for contempt of court in refusing to obey a subpoena. The record shows that the proceedings were strictly in accordance with articles 528 et seq., Code of Criminal Procedure, and that on the proper final hearing the judgment nisi was made final.

It has been the uniform holding of this court and our Supreme Court, when it had criminal jurisdiction, that appeals did not lie in such proceedings. It is unnecessary to cite all the cases, but see State v. Thurmond, 37 Texas, 340; Carter v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 165; Crow v. State, 24 Texas, 12; Borer v. State, 63 S. W. Rep., 1133.

As this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal the case is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gardner v. State
352 S.W.2d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Lawley v. State
36 S.W.2d 1035 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Hudgens v. Yancey
284 S.W. 347 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Long v. State
199 S.W. 619 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.W. 458, 72 Tex. Crim. 176, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pegram-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.