Pegg v. City of Columbus
This text of 10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 199 (Pegg v. City of Columbus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ordinance in question, No. 21927, is “to license and regulate the use of the streets of the city of Columbus, state of Ohio, by persons who use vehicles thereon,” etc. Bearing in mind the definition of “use” as a continued and repeated practice, we are of the opinion that the ordinance applies to those who, in the above sense, use the vehicles described. This construction would apply to non-residents as well as residents, and must be settled in each case according to the facts.
The other questions are disposed of as we think in the ease of Marmet v. The State, 45 Ohio State, 63.
As the above construction will not give a common relief to all the plaintiffs in Pegg v. Columbus, the decree in that case as in the others must be for the defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pegg-v-city-of-columbus-ohiocirct-1907.