Pegg v. Capp

Indiana Supreme Court

Pegg v. Capp

2 Blackf. 257, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 26

DecidedMay 21, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Blackf. 257 (Pegg v. Capp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pegg v. Capp, 2 Blackf. 257, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 26 (Ind. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

THE return to a subpoena in Chancery against Abner McCarty and John Pegg was as follows: “Executed on Abner M’Carty the 25 March, 1826. John Pegg not found. 20 March, 1826. —R. John, sh’ff.” A decree, reciting that it appeared to the satisfaction of the Court that the subpoena had been duly executed, was entered against the defendants •pro confesso. Held, that the return was insufficient to authorise a decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE return to a subpoena in Chancery against Abner McCarty and John Pegg was as follows: “Executed on Abner M’Carty the 25 March, 1826. John Pegg not found. 20 March, 1826. —R. John, sh’ff.” A decree, reciting that it appeared to the satisfaction of the Court that the subpoena had been duly executed, was entered against the defendants •pro confesso. Held, that the return was insufficient to authorise a decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Blackf. 257, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pegg-v-capp-ind-1829.