Peetsch v. Quinn

City of New York Municipal Court

Peetsch v. Quinn

18 Misc. 748, 42 N.Y.S. 1130

DecidedDecember 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Misc. 748 (Peetsch v. Quinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peetsch v. Quinn, 18 Misc. 748, 42 N.Y.S. 1130 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

We think that the proceeding herein against Curran was a special proceeding, and as costs were therein awarded Curran, he. had the right to examine the plaintiff under the order granted herein.

Plaintiff having failed to pay such costs, the remedy, so taken, in our judgment, was not objectionable merely because it was retroactive.

The order must be affirmed, with costs.

Van Wyck, Ch. J., and O’Dwyer, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI