Peete v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Peete v. State

820 S.W.2d 532, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1571, 1991 WL 206822

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 1991·No. No. 59730·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnnie Peete, appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record below and the briefs of the parties and find that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we also find that there would be no jurisprudential purpose served by a full opinion, we affirm the dismissal of appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties, solely for their own use, explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnnie Peete, appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record below and the briefs of the parties and find that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we also find that there would be no jurisprudential purpose served by a full opinion, we affirm the dismissal of appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties, solely for their own use, explaining the reasons for our holding.

Peete v. State, 820 S.W.2d 532, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1571, 1991 WL 206822 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

820 S.W.2d 532 (Peete v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.