Peet v. United States

399 U.S. 523, 90 S. Ct. 2258, 26 L. Ed. 2d 783, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1270
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 29, 1970·No. No. 1886·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for resentencing. Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U. S. 295.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peet v. United States, 399 U.S. 523, 90 S. Ct. 2258, 26 L. Ed. 2d 783, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 1270 (1970).

399 U.S. 523 (Peet v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ARCHBP. REV. METRO. A. SENYSHYN v. Karlak
341 A.2d 114 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Archbishop Most Reverend Metropolitan Ambrose Senyshyn v. Karlak
341 A.2d 114 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
United States v. Stanley Albert Kohls
441 F.2d 1076 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Erie Conference Central Office v. Burdick
269 A.2d 735 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
ERIE CON. CO, U. METH. CH. v. BURDICK
269 A.2d 735 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)