Peet v. Rose City Dodge, Inc.

444 P.2d 478, 251 Or. 68, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 423
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 444 P.2d 478 (Peet v. Rose City Dodge, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peet v. Rose City Dodge, Inc., 444 P.2d 478, 251 Or. 68, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 423 (Or. 1968).

Opinion

O’CONNELL, J.

This is an action brought by the Department of Employment Commissioner to recover taxes assessed against defendant Bose City Dodge, Inc., for unemployment insurance. A default judgment was entered against Bose City Dodge, Inc. Defendants Stupek and Eheler moved for an involuntary nonsuit which was granted and plaintiff appeals. Bose City Dodge, Inc. has not appealed.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges “The defendants Baymond Stupek and David J. Eheler have so manipulated and dominated said corporation as to render said corporation their alter ego for the purpose of defeating the claims of the plaintiff herein.”

The only question on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence supporting the foregoing allegation to present an issue of fact for the jury.

We agree with the trial court that there was insufficient evidence to permit the case to go to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.
654 P.2d 1092 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1982)
Elvalsons v. Industrial Covers, Inc.
525 P.2d 105 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 P.2d 478, 251 Or. 68, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peet-v-rose-city-dodge-inc-or-1968.