Peet, Simms & Co. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Peet, Simms & Co. v. Jackson

21 La. Ann. 267

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 15, 1869

DocketNo. 2117

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 La. Ann. 267 (Peet, Simms & Co. v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peet, Simms & Co. v. Jackson, 21 La. Ann. 267 (La. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

IIowe, J.

The bill of exchange sued upon in this case matured on the fourth December, 1861, and the suit was not instituted until the eighteenth January, 1868. Neither interruption nor renunciation of prescription is shown. The plea of prescription of five years filed in the court below should have been sustained. Rabel v. Pourciau, 20 An. 132; Smith v. Stewart, lately decided.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and that there be judgment for the defendants, with costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IIowe, J.

The bill of exchange sued upon in this case matured on the fourth December, 1861, and the suit was not instituted until the eighteenth January, 1868. Neither interruption nor renunciation of prescription is shown. The plea of prescription of five years filed in the court below should have been sustained. Rabel v. Pourciau, 20 An. 132; Smith v. Stewart, lately decided.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and that there be judgment for the defendants, with costs in both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 La. Ann. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peet-simms-co-v-jackson-la-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack