Peerless Light Co. v. Gimbel Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peerless Light Co. v. Gimbel Bros.

218 A.D. 864

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.D. 864 (Peerless Light Co. v. Gimbel Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peerless Light Co. v. Gimbel Bros., 218 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order granting leave to serve amended answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents, and votes for a modification to provide for the service of the answer to the amended complaint as proposed, except as to the defense that plaintiff was not authorized to do business in the State of New York. (See Wood & Selick v. Ball, 190 N. Y. 217.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order granting leave to serve amended answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents, and votes for a modification to provide for the service of the answer to the amended complaint as proposed, except as to the defense that plaintiff was not authorized to do business in the State of New York. (See Wood & Selick v. Ball, 190 N. Y. 217.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peerless-light-co-v-gimbel-bros-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack