Peerless Coat & Apron Supply Co. v. Commercial Coat & Apron Supply Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Peerless Coat & Apron Supply Co. v. Commercial Coat & Apron Supply Co.

257 A.D. 845, 12 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 845 (Peerless Coat & Apron Supply Co. v. Commercial Coat & Apron Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peerless Coat & Apron Supply Co. v. Commercial Coat & Apron Supply Co., 257 A.D. 845, 12 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s motion to punish a witness for contempt for failure to obey a subpoena reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements payable by respondents, and the motion granted, without costs. The witness is in contempt but may purge himself thereof by his appearance for examination at a time to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. Order granting respondents’ motion to vacate the subpoena and notice of examination reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. The witness was not free to disregard the subpoena. The papers on appeal indicate that substantial grounds for examination exist. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s motion to punish a witness for contempt for failure to obey a subpoena reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements payable by respondents, and the motion granted, without costs. The witness is in contempt but may purge himself thereof by his appearance for examination at a time to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. Order granting respondents’ motion to vacate the subpoena and notice of examination reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. The witness was not free to disregard the subpoena. The papers on appeal indicate that substantial grounds for examination exist. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 845, 12 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peerless-coat-apron-supply-co-v-commercial-coat-apron-supply-co-nyappdiv-1939.